<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merging Social Media and Ministry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frankchiapperino.com/2009/08/12/merging-social-media-and-ministry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frankchiapperino.com/2009/08/12/merging-social-media-and-ministry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Reasons Your Church Should Be On Facebook &#124; TechPastor.net</title>
		<link>http://frankchiapperino.com/2009/08/12/merging-social-media-and-ministry/comment-page-1/#comment-3838</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Reasons Your Church Should Be On Facebook &#124; TechPastor.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankchiapperino.com/?p=730#comment-3838</guid>
		<description>[...] Merging Social Media and Minsitry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Merging Social Media and Minsitry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://frankchiapperino.com/2009/08/12/merging-social-media-and-ministry/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankchiapperino.com/?p=730#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Norma, most people are calling this type of video teaching called a &quot;video venue.&quot;  Many churches are doing this sort of thing in movietheaters and other locations as they plant new churches and move to a multi-site strategy.  Lifechurch.tv has probably had the most success with this approach.  Anyone can access these great communicators through a new tool that Lifechurch has set up - http://videoteaching.com hope that helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norma, most people are calling this type of video teaching called a &#8220;video venue.&#8221;  Many churches are doing this sort of thing in movietheaters and other locations as they plant new churches and move to a multi-site strategy.  Lifechurch.tv has probably had the most success with this approach.  Anyone can access these great communicators through a new tool that Lifechurch has set up &#8211; <a href="http://videoteaching.com" rel="nofollow">http://videoteaching.com</a> hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norma D Moore</title>
		<link>http://frankchiapperino.com/2009/08/12/merging-social-media-and-ministry/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Norma D Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankchiapperino.com/?p=730#comment-641</guid>
		<description>I have heard of Andy Stanley preaching in different churches but it not there physically but it seems that he is.  They say this is great and unbelievable?

What is this called.  Thank you.  Normad77@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard of Andy Stanley preaching in different churches but it not there physically but it seems that he is.  They say this is great and unbelievable?</p>
<p>What is this called.  Thank you.  <a href="mailto:Normad77@yahoo.com">Normad77@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Haas</title>
		<link>http://frankchiapperino.com/2009/08/12/merging-social-media-and-ministry/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankchiapperino.com/?p=730#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Being relevant and engaging the culture should always be done in a cogent and concise manner, especially within written media. At the same time it must be done lovingly and creatively so as to hold the attention of the reader.  In a world of text message syntax, this can be a challenge for those who do not view their blogging as a craft.  This is part of the fun of blogging...rediscovering the craft of clearly communicating in a manner that holds the readers attention.  As believers, there is more at stake when we blog than repeat visits to our blog site, it is the souls of people for whom Christ died that hangs in the balance.  It is the carrying out of the Great Commission through making disciples and teaching them to obey all that Christ has commanded.  It is varying the written blog with video.  It is not enough to engage only the &quot;eye gate&quot;, but we must also use technology to engage the &quot;ear gate&quot; along with it.

Perhaps 4. should be:  

4.Engage in it as a Great Commission craft
    - Hone your skills
    - Use written and video communications

Hey, I&#039;m still learning too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being relevant and engaging the culture should always be done in a cogent and concise manner, especially within written media. At the same time it must be done lovingly and creatively so as to hold the attention of the reader.  In a world of text message syntax, this can be a challenge for those who do not view their blogging as a craft.  This is part of the fun of blogging&#8230;rediscovering the craft of clearly communicating in a manner that holds the readers attention.  As believers, there is more at stake when we blog than repeat visits to our blog site, it is the souls of people for whom Christ died that hangs in the balance.  It is the carrying out of the Great Commission through making disciples and teaching them to obey all that Christ has commanded.  It is varying the written blog with video.  It is not enough to engage only the &#8220;eye gate&#8221;, but we must also use technology to engage the &#8220;ear gate&#8221; along with it.</p>
<p>Perhaps 4. should be:  </p>
<p>4.Engage in it as a Great Commission craft<br />
    &#8211; Hone your skills<br />
    &#8211; Use written and video communications</p>
<p>Hey, I&#8217;m still learning too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pondering</title>
		<link>http://frankchiapperino.com/2009/08/12/merging-social-media-and-ministry/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Pondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankchiapperino.com/?p=730#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Interesting approach to being in the world.  I gather it is about relevant communication.  Without being relevant you risk not reaching your target audience.  It was interesting that you pointed out two way communication.  Most provocative Christian Blogs are just that thought provoking.  Introducing a comparison of the world as it is in the context of Church, compared to as it should be.  Unfortunately, with limited exceptions, the conversation is still one sided.

I would add another qualifier, identify your audience.  
In the forum of social media, you have little control of who becomes your audience.  Even framing things in a particular direction does not precluded outside interaction.  

Those who engage in utilizing social media enjoy it&#039;s flexibility, creativity, and freedom of expression.  When authors enter into blogging, or other forms of social media they should have a plan for how &quot;authentic&quot; they want to dialogue.

This really boils down to censorship.  If the author is only willing to permit posts which are in agreement, one must question the authenticity of the communication.  Meaning, the audience quickly finds out that the blog is a ruse for some other agenda beyond open dialogue.

Just a point to ponder, as you promote SM as another potential missional effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting approach to being in the world.  I gather it is about relevant communication.  Without being relevant you risk not reaching your target audience.  It was interesting that you pointed out two way communication.  Most provocative Christian Blogs are just that thought provoking.  Introducing a comparison of the world as it is in the context of Church, compared to as it should be.  Unfortunately, with limited exceptions, the conversation is still one sided.</p>
<p>I would add another qualifier, identify your audience.<br />
In the forum of social media, you have little control of who becomes your audience.  Even framing things in a particular direction does not precluded outside interaction.  </p>
<p>Those who engage in utilizing social media enjoy it&#8217;s flexibility, creativity, and freedom of expression.  When authors enter into blogging, or other forms of social media they should have a plan for how &#8220;authentic&#8221; they want to dialogue.</p>
<p>This really boils down to censorship.  If the author is only willing to permit posts which are in agreement, one must question the authenticity of the communication.  Meaning, the audience quickly finds out that the blog is a ruse for some other agenda beyond open dialogue.</p>
<p>Just a point to ponder, as you promote SM as another potential missional effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M. Stone</title>
		<link>http://frankchiapperino.com/2009/08/12/merging-social-media-and-ministry/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M. Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankchiapperino.com/?p=730#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Good stuff man ... lots to think about.  This is a topic we&#039;ll be discussing for a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff man &#8230; lots to think about.  This is a topic we&#8217;ll be discussing for a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
